Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post Reply
MonsieurX

Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by MonsieurX » Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:58 am

Hi, I need a little technical advice.

I've sent my dampers for refurbishing. They are the AA2 Bilstein model with valve code B.

The refurbishing company rtec calls me back to tell me that while the rears are OK in their tests, the fronts do not seem to change speed/hardness when switching between setting 1 and 5 on the damper.

Is this standard? Is there any measurement that I could give them? A ratio difference between the fronts and rears for example? There's the weight distribution and RBBC that comes into mind but I'm not an engineer to be able to tell them how this works or confirm if that's ok.

They checked both which should exclude a malfunction.

Im still waiting for the answer from the factory but it's Easter and they might be out. I thought i would post this here for future reference.

User avatar
John Scherrer
Global Moderator
Posts: 5124
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:20 pm
Location: Willington, Bedford UK
Contact:

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by John Scherrer » Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:58 am

It's possible that something inside is seized (stuck), so the outside adjuster no longer causes the inside valve to change?
Atom 3 310 Supercharged (2011), Now Sold

l33haw

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by l33haw » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:53 pm

Out of interest, any news on this?

MonsieurX

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by MonsieurX » Wed May 02, 2012 2:00 pm

Yes

Tom sent me a graph coming from Bilstein with the right nm/speed/time for the dampers. They came back and they are a bit stiffer - but not that much from what i saw in just one test.

Trouble was that the low-weight of the atom did not give much of a reading for the instruments. So nothing was seized or clogged.

l33haw

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by l33haw » Wed May 02, 2012 2:09 pm

[quote="MonsieurX"]
Yes

Trouble was that the low-weight of the atom did not give much of a reading for the instruments. So nothing was seized or clogged.
[/quote]

Thanks for that. Kind of goes along with my theory that adjusting the front dampers on Atom 2s doesn't do an awful lot.

MonsieurX

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by MonsieurX » Wed May 02, 2012 2:30 pm

I'll have to test that further. I remember doing some tests and it did make a difference for sharp curves and whether it understeered or not...

The rears definitely made a difference (drift machine style :roflp:)

MonsieurX

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by MonsieurX » Mon May 21, 2012 11:52 am

After some tests, there is a major difference. Rebound is much firmer. The difference is not that big but it feels much steadier.

Has anyone tested the difference between the new bilsteins with 10 settings vs the old bilsteins with 5 settings?

User avatar
wasp
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Herefordshire
Contact:

Re: Damper differences and refurbishing references

Post by wasp » Mon May 21, 2012 2:57 pm

[quote="MonsieurX"]
After some tests, there is a major difference. Rebound is much firmer. The difference is not that big but it feels much steadier.

Has anyone tested the difference between the new bilsteins with 10 settings vs the old bilsteins with 5 settings?
[/quote]
Yes, but as it was also back to backing an Atom 2, 300 v an Atom 3, 300 it is hard to be specific about the difference that just the bilsteins make. The Atom 3 is certainly much much more compliant (a different league entirely) over bumps and dealing with camber changes.
I'm sure Tom would be able to provide some statistics! ;D

Cheers,
Stu
Atom 4, Gr Yaris

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests