A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:) ;) :D ;D >:( :( :o 8) ??? ::) :P :-[ :-X :-\ :-* :'( >:D :laugh: ^-^ O0 :angel: :police: :td: :tu: :pop: :doh: :drool: :wize: :H: :rtfm: :fence: :google: :OT: :vroom: :checkeredflag: :embarassed: :faint: :roflp:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 7 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by GraemeW » Sat Nov 18, 2023 10:00 am

The factory setting for the road appear to be the softest? No more clicks available ?

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by speedmachine » Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:18 pm

I’ve had the atom 2 and 3.5 with stock seats and tillets in the 3.5 and the seats are like moulded to my body, perfect, even better than the tillets. So yeah, different shapes👌🏻

I cant believe you have less comfort in the 4, have you tried dialing the ohlins down to softest setting? With that setting I think it even is too soft and comfy🤔
On the track setting on the road, I think it is quite harsh…

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by atomiser » Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:32 pm

Agree on seats, but resolved by having tillett B4 and a five point IMHO (6ft7). Though I still get a beating from mistress ariel, at least I'm comfortable in the process :-)

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by yogiatom2 » Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:24 pm

New Atom at last. Would love to see pictures of your new Atom.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by GraemeW » Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:09 pm

I'm only 500 miles into my new 4. Had a 3.5 before for 5 years, which I loved. I miss many aspects of the 3.5, but the 4 is better in all areas for me except;

1) comfort. Unlike those above, I find the 4 seats less comfortable, and not bigger inside when seated, than the 3.5. Everyone's body shape is different I suppose. Im 6' 3" or 1,95m.
2) engine vibration through chassis at idle is much more than the 3.5. Not a big issue, and fine on the move.
3) Brakes are nothing like the Alcons on 3.5. They're ok and there are fixes for their "softness"

Where the 4 really excels is the ride, especially on the onlins. The handling and stability are first rate. The 3.5 was as well, but less so, and on some poor UK roads, it was horrible with bump steer etc. Ive test driven the 4 on some of the roads I previously avoided in the 3.5 and its fantastic there too.

It depends on your budget and what you want to do with the car. Find a good 3.5 and you will have 80% of the fun of the 4 at approx 50% of the price imho.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by atomiser » Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:39 am

AlanP wrote: Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:02 pm I'm not alone in having a very unpopular view that the supercharged cars are ever so slightly more exciting than the turbocharged ones
Plus the brakes work and they don't have problems with the cooling.
When I say ever so slightly I do, of course, mean a cock sight more exciting. And I've driven both. I'd be impressed if anybody came in here saying the car they DON'T own is the better.
A
Whole heartedly agree!

As much as the 3.5 is behind the 4 in terms of development etc, the challenge of driving a 3.5, the brilliant manual gearbox and that screaming k20 engine more than makes up for it.

The 3.5 cup resolves most of the understeer problems, but the frequent times I'm behind a 4 on track, the rear 255s and torque means 4s start walking away mid corner - but with a little less drama/noise :-).

The 3 braking is similar if you have alcons all round and the latest two part discs that the factory sells - I can well believe 100-0 in 43m.

BTW the 3.5 cup was a dramatic upgrade from a 2 - even with super sticky tyres the atom 2 understeer/oversteer was frustrating on track. The alcon fronts to all round was also night and day, which was surprising since I originally though that was BS.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by fb.george » Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:43 am

Ps I have always stayed NA as it’s fast enough and you cannot beat the “roar” of the intake bellowing by your head😀

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by fb.george » Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:42 am

Rich, if you only ever drive a 3, you will love it. There isn’t a bad Atom. They are just different.
I have an 11 year old 3, from new, now with 64000 miles on the clock. Loved them all, but admit the sunnier miles are better than the rain. But as speedmachine says, you don’t buy such a car for comfort.
I don’t have the talent to be the fastest on a track day, but am always top quartile just by dint of the car itself. I enjoy track days for me, so am happy having fun and the car gives you plenty of that.
And I don’t recognise the comment about “the Atom now does corners”. Mine seems telepathic on the road.
I have no doubt at all the 4 is the much better car and a leap forward as everyone has said. It should be. That’s evolution. But I have resisted upgrading simply because I am so happy with my 3.
If you want the best, the 4 it should be. But I would say not because the earlier cars are deficient. Cheers

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by AlanP » Sun Apr 16, 2023 1:16 am

I will admit, and I thought when I first saw them, the hubs are sexy!

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by speedmachine » Sat Apr 15, 2023 7:42 am

Here you see the difference in hubs, thats what I mean

Guess which is the 4 and which is not
Attachments
00021B3C-65B2-49CD-A4A0-DA6BB1C976A1.jpeg
00021B3C-65B2-49CD-A4A0-DA6BB1C976A1.jpeg (1.11 MiB) Viewed 10254 times
CE69C8A4-6754-4FDC-B39F-EE2D366B8991.jpeg
CE69C8A4-6754-4FDC-B39F-EE2D366B8991.jpeg (3.15 MiB) Viewed 10254 times
85407A05-94D1-444A-AC40-444DA96ABEB5.jpeg
85407A05-94D1-444A-AC40-444DA96ABEB5.jpeg (1.3 MiB) Viewed 10254 times
DCE7665B-9DCA-47AD-B81B-335D9DF8AB4D.jpeg
DCE7665B-9DCA-47AD-B81B-335D9DF8AB4D.jpeg (1.16 MiB) Viewed 10254 times

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by speedmachine » Sat Apr 15, 2023 7:38 am

I have a 4 and have had a sc 2 and a sc 3.5.
To be honest if i had have the chance to put the sequential in that last one I would have never bought a 4. The 3.5 is such thrilling device and feels so sharp.
Downsides compared to the 4 are the comfort, allthough you shouldnt buy any atom for comfort, the pre 4 cars are pretty harsh. The setup on the 4 make it a more compliant car, you can go fast in more places (bad roads) and more easily.
You can pinpoint all the “upgrades” the 4 has compared to the 3.5 as bad things as well, you loose some of the involvement.
For me, being 40 now and have a sore back, I truly LOVE the 4. Less back pain and it makes me feel like such a good driver. I am MUCH faster on track as well.

Ideally I would have both, I might just buy my old car back to accompany my 4.

You cant go wrong, but the 4 is the better car if you either dont like self destruction or want to be the fastest with limited skills.

Last thing to say is that in terms if build quality, the 4 is a giant leap forward. For instance the hubs are a wonderful billet machined, shiny hollow part on the 4 and a black (i think mg part) lump on the 3.5. Lightyears different in a lot of places. So quality wise I can safely say, without [mention]AlanP[/mention] with the coolest car in the world saying differently, the 4 is the best car.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by AlanP » Fri Apr 14, 2023 10:02 pm

I'm not alone in having a very unpopular view that the supercharged cars are ever so slightly more exciting than the turbocharged ones
Plus the brakes work and they don't have problems with the cooling.
When I say ever so slightly I do, of course, mean a cock sight more exciting. And I've driven both. I'd be impressed if anybody came in here saying the car they DON'T own is the better.
A

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by rich77 » Fri Apr 07, 2023 10:01 pm

markwetherall wrote: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:00 pm Speak to Ben at the factory. See what the lead time is currently for a new one, some pretty well priced 2nd hand ones but also some over priced ones. Be careful and also don't go by current price list. Prices have just gone up this year so make sure you reflect this in what you buy. You wont be disappointed with the Atom. Great car. Happy hunting
Yes, I've contacted Ben and I have the latest price list. Lead time is 28 months.

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by markwetherall » Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:00 pm

Speak to Ben at the factory. See what the lead time is currently for a new one, some pretty well priced 2nd hand ones but also some over priced ones. Be careful and also don't go by current price list. Prices have just gone up this year so make sure you reflect this in what you buy. You wont be disappointed with the Atom. Great car. Happy hunting

Re: A4 vs earlier models. Newbie questions.

by rich77 » Fri Apr 07, 2023 5:59 pm

markwetherall wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 2:40 pm I have owned both. If your budget stretches far enough buy a 4. Massive jump forward. Main reasons for big improvements are:- Different setup on suspension with anti dive points, larger wheels, thicker frame therefore much stiffer, large jump in torque due to turbo engine. The 4 is a lot more comfortable due to much better seats. It is just a much better car all round. The Atom 4 is easily the much better car.
Thanks Mark.

It's interesting that it hasn't reduced residual prices on Mk3 cars much?

I am leaning towards going for a new one, but I may have to get a used car in the meantime!

Top